Fragmented data
Energy, asset and operational information sits across separate systems and teams.
Connect building engineering, energy management and portfolio intelligence to identify waste, prioritise intervention and coordinate improvements across your estate.
Comparable performance.
Clear investment priorities.
From individual sites to coordinated action.
Repeated reporting costs and underused internal expertise compound the problem. Leadership needs a consistent view of performance, while site teams need the tools and support to act.
Energy, asset and operational information sits across separate systems and teams.
Different metrics and methods prevent meaningful comparison between sites.
Projects compete for funding without a shared basis for investment decisions.
Successful measures remain local instead of being assessed for wider deployment.
Unclear responsibilities slow delivery and weaken accountability for results.
Bring energy, asset and operational information into a consistent evidence base.
Benchmark sites with context for building use, operating hours and demand.
Rank measures by savings, cost, payback, risk and deliverability.
Validate interventions before applying them to other suitable buildings.
Agree responsibilities, delivery milestones and measurable outcomes.
Consistent data, engineering judgement and operational knowledge create a practical programme that your teams can own and maintain.
Coordinate applicable ESOS, SECR, CCA and ISO 50001 work through shared datasets and aligned methodologies. Heat-network requirements can also be incorporated where relevant, while retaining each scheme’s specific obligations.
See where energy is being used, where performance differs and where to investigate next. ZECO supports the evidence; experienced engineers turn it into practical decisions.
Book a ZECO conversationBring your buildings into one view, identify outliers and direct engineering effort towards the sites that warrant a closer look.
Platform visualisations from Zerith. Figures shown are illustrative, not a savings forecast.
Use the evidence to select sites, define interventions and direct engineering effort where it can create meaningful value.
Explore Building PerformanceSelect representative and high-impact sites for engineering audits, energy treasure hunts or Kaizen events. Combine technical analysis with the knowledge of the people operating each site.
Address plant sequencing, operating schedules, setpoints and control strategies. Establish whether an intervention can transfer to similar systems elsewhere.
Assess opportunities such as rooftop and car-park solar PV against demand, site constraints and investment priorities.
Investigate electrical distribution, power quality and infrastructure opportunities as part of a coordinated estate programme.
Your teams use ZECO with structured training, guidance and engineering oversight from Zerith. Build ownership while retaining specialist review where required.
Internal teams manage routine activities while Zerith supports complex analysis, selected site investigations, quality assurance and portfolio strategy.
Zerith coordinates the agreed programme, with ZECO providing portfolio visibility and a consistent evidence base for decisions and progress reviews.
Choose representative sites and understand the system, operating pattern and baseline.
Implement a focused intervention and confirm the outcome before wider deployment.
Check suitability at other sites, allowing for technical and operational differences.
Track performance, capture lessons and feed new opportunities into the programme.
Build a phased, multi-year programme around operational requirements, capital planning and Net Zero objectives. Coordinate supply chains and procurement across sites to support economies of scale and consistent delivery.
These examples describe proposed delivery models and projected outcomes published by Zerith. They are not presented as completed savings.
50+ office buildings
Up to 60%£10,000–£12,500 estimated saving versus traditional consultancy.
Internal teams prepare the audit using ZECO, supported by pre- and post-audit guidance, engineering quality assurance and ESOS Lead Assessor review.
Two manufacturing sites + distribution
Up to 50%£6,000–£7,500 estimated saving versus traditional consultancy.
A client-led treasure hunt, audit or Kaizen event combines site knowledge with on-site specialist support, followed by a structured evidence pack and assessor review.
Multiple compliance schemes
Shared deliveryNo quantified saving confirmed for this example.
Consolidate applicable CCA, SECR and ISO 50001 / ESOS work around shared data, training and technical oversight to reduce duplication and improve auditability.
Across six UK sites, with delivery envisaged in less than three years. Supported audits, BeMS and FMAS reviews informed an energy-saving project roadmap.
A desktop review and feasibility study led to load-balancing systems on test sites. The published case states that measurement and verification was in progress.
Portfolio EPC review, MEES assessment and BeMS audit informed a benchmark EPC and an upgrade strategy. This is an identified rating improvement, not a measured energy saving.
Understand the programme, the delivery options and what the figures mean.
Book a free 30-minute callA structured approach to energy performance, compliance and decarbonisation across multiple buildings or assets. Consistent data, meaningful benchmarking and coordinated engineering programmes help improve visibility and prioritise work across the estate.
Start with reliable data and an understanding of actual operation. Identify unnecessary consumption, assess HVAC and controls, and prioritise practical measures before larger investment. Validate successful measures before adapting them to similar sites.
Yes. Shared datasets and coordinated analysis can reduce duplication across applicable schemes such as ESOS, SECR, CCA and ISO 50001. Each scheme’s requirements and any required assessor or certification responsibilities still need to be satisfied.
ZECO brings energy and compliance information into a structured portfolio view. It supports benchmarking, investigation of unusual consumption, prioritisation and reporting, with engineers and operational teams providing context. Visibility and update frequency depend on available data and connections.
Zerith describes indicative compliance delivery cost reductions of 20–30% for suitable single-service delivery and 50–70% for suitable multi-site, multi-service programmes. These are not energy-bill savings or guarantees. Energy-saving opportunities require site-specific engineering assessment, implementation and verification.
Yes, through a supported internal model using ZECO, training, technical guidance and review. Hybrid and fully outsourced options are also available. The division of responsibilities should reflect internal capability, programme complexity and required specialist oversight.
Review HVAC, controls, schedules, setpoints and BeMS operation to identify waste and system underperformance. EPC, MEES and NABERS assessments can inform relevant decisions, with more detailed engineering reviews where needed. Proven measures can then be assessed for use across similar buildings.
Align datasets and methods, then account for differences in building use, occupancy, operating hours and demand. Rank interventions by impact, feasibility, risk and return, and phase the programme around operational and investment constraints.
Yes, where suitable data is available. Use consistent KPIs and appropriate baselines to compare performance, allowing for changes such as weather, occupancy, production or operating hours. This helps distinguish measured improvement from a forecast or an identified opportunity.
Tell us about your sites, your data and the decisions you need to make. We’ll help identify a practical starting point.
Prefer email? info@zerith.uk